STE Smart Beta Update : 30th Aug 2017
image credit to trackinsight.com |
Time flies,
It has been more than a year after my first published of STE Smart Beta concept
and bench-marking against STI Index.
FYI, I have
started my STE Smart Beta on 28th Aug 2016 with a capital of $100K with equal
weighted investing in 14 stocks which fall under the criteria of PE<10 or
Dividend Yield >5%.
You may find
the detail in this link (here
).
Now, let’s
look at the result of STE Smart Beta vs STI Index from 28th Aug 2016
till 25th Aug 2017 :
It seems
that STE Smart Beta has out-performed the STI Index by 5.7% excluding dividend.
YZJ Shipping clearly out-performed others
with outstanding returned of 103% and follow by GLP (75%), DBS (35%), UOB (31%) and OCBC (27%).
Banking
stocks have shown good returns in 2017 till YTD which have greatly contributed
for this better performance vs STI Index.
SPH and Star Hub were among the worst which require
no further explanation as we knew very well on their respective challenges.
Re-balancing of STE Smart Beta
Portfolio :
As expected
, total stocks selected under the STE Smart Beta criteria reduced to 9 only as
compared to 14 previously in view of better performance from banking counters
which made the 3 Big Banks being excluded from the index.
With the
inclusion Jardine Matheson into STI Index in Sep 2016 and the PE of 7 at
current price level makes it into the list of STE Smart Beta Index. The other
counter included in the list will be CapitaLand with PE of 9.6 in view of
better earning sighted in 2017.
As usual the
total value from the portfolio will be equally distributed among these 9 counters in this re-balancing process.
Let’s see
how it turns out next year , will it be able to beat the STI again in 2018?
Cheers !!
Quote Of The Day :
“The idea that a bell rings to signal when investors should
get into or out of the market is simply not credible. After nearly 50 years in
this business, I do not know of anybody who has done it successfully and
consistently. I don't even know anybody who knows anybody who has done it
successfully and consistently.” By John Bogle
Comments
Post a Comment