Do You Look At Management Fee in Selecting Which REIT to Invest ?
We do
understand that most of the time, "yield" is the main consideration for investors
to invest in REIT and of course other than P/NAV, gearing, interest coverage
ratio, asset quality, occupancy rate etc.
Other than
normal property expenses such as interest & finance cost and operating
expenses, the management fee is also the major cost for a REIT. How often do we really look at the management fees
as one of the criteria in selecting a REIT to invest?
If every $1
we earn from the property but 40cts goes to the management fee, then we may need
to pay more attention to this major cost as it may have a huge impact on our long
term investment return as some might say “ We just work for the Management !! “
In recent
K-REIT’s AGM which I have attended last week, as usual, this issue of high
management fees been brought up again by shareholders during the meeting. (Mr Mano fired the first salvo … )
If you have scrutinized their Annual Report, you may find out that it is not difficult to spot
the figure as the expense for Management Fee = $50.5 Mil vs Net Property Income =
$128.3 Mil in FY 2016. Which amounting to approx. 39% of the total NPI. Well, if
we compared it to other peers like Capital Commercial REIT which generated NPI
of $231.2 Mil in 2016, but only spent about $15.14 Mil as expenses in
Management Fees. ( 6.5% vs NPI ) , then we may see a huge difference.
At the current price
which given Dividend Yield of 5.9 % for Capital Commercial Reit vs 5.5% yield
for K-Reit, obviously, I know which REIT I prefer to put my money and invest more… in the long
run.
K-Reit was
one of my major holding right after GFC because of the strong sponsor ( GLC )
during that uncertain and volatile market, but I have since trimmed it down
much in my holding and diversify to others REIT along the way. ( At the peak,
I used to own 252,000 shares of K-Reit in early 2010 as compared to now only 40,000 ).
I may
consider to further reduce my holding in K-REIT if opportunities arise where I
have a chance to divest and switch to other counters, although no doubt that their
assets quality are in good and prime locations.
Below table
published in The Straits Times Business sector on 11 Jul 2015 shall give you
some clue about the cost of Management fees vs Revenue among the REITs in
Singapore.
image credit straitstime.com |
Append below,
few good articles which I have searched and selected from WEBs, it included
article from Newspaper, Money Management Portals and Bloggers. This may serve
as good start of reading point to have a better understanding of the cost impact of
Management Fees in REITs.
Investors
would definitely welcome more specific guideline from MAS with regards to how
REITs should form and construct their management fees in line with the market’s
expectation and unit-holders value.
Enjoy
reading !!
Cheers !!
////////////////////////////
Appendix ///////////////////
REIT Fee Structure–Are they rewarding investors or the sponsors, from InvestmentMoat, 15 June 2012
REIT Fee Structure, from InvestmentMoat, 4 Aug 2012
MGCCT's
fee model for future Mapletree Reits, from BT
Invest, 20 May 2013
A Look at REIT’s Fees, from The Motley Fool SG, 1 Oct 2014
Check
out Reit manager's fee, not just dividend, from The Straits Times, 11 Jul 2015
MAS
tweaks REIT rules, from TodayOnline, 2 Jul 2015 ( the full report from MAS –here )
-------- End -----------
< Credit goes to all the Writers / Authors and Publishers of above link document/articles>
PS:
The recent hotly debated topic of " Removing Manager " from Sabana REIT is a bit different with " Principal-Agent Problem " ( which I have blogged about it here ) if you look at the above table, the ratio of " management fee vs income " was quite in line with market when the time of the article published. But, the problem of this REIT is more on declining DPU due to purchase of "overvalue " asset with temporary income support where eventually drop year by year ... their DPU has dropped from 9.38 cents (FY 2013 ) to 4.64 cats (FY 2013) while their management fees maintain at $5.3 Mil in 2016 vs $5.8 Mil in 2013( mainly because of their fees are being pegged with asset value rather than DPU ).
Now the ratio of "Management fee vs NPI " has increased to 9.3% base on FY2016's figure.
Quote Of The Day :
PS:
The recent hotly debated topic of " Removing Manager " from Sabana REIT is a bit different with " Principal-Agent Problem " ( which I have blogged about it here ) if you look at the above table, the ratio of " management fee vs income " was quite in line with market when the time of the article published. But, the problem of this REIT is more on declining DPU due to purchase of "overvalue " asset with temporary income support where eventually drop year by year ... their DPU has dropped from 9.38 cents (FY 2013 ) to 4.64 cats (FY 2013) while their management fees maintain at $5.3 Mil in 2016 vs $5.8 Mil in 2013( mainly because of their fees are being pegged with asset value rather than DPU ).
Now the ratio of "Management fee vs NPI " has increased to 9.3% base on FY2016's figure.
Quote Of The Day :
"We have almost certainly not conquered the business cycle. We may not even have tamed it. " Philip Fisher
Will you look at CEO's pay too when investing in non REITs?
ReplyDeleteYah ! Uncle CW , U are right ,, we don't ... mots of the time ... just look at the P&L ...
DeleteIn fact ,, some CEO are getting astronomical high pay... :-(
Some CEO's talent is "over-rated " !!
Cheers !!
Ah I was about to comment on Sabana REIT saga when I read your "PS" portion.
ReplyDeleteAt 9.3%, it is now one of the highest.
Yah! There is more than one way to skin a cat !! Managers can use the creative thing like " temporary income support" to boot the DPU by purchasing over value property .. :-(
DeleteCheers !!