Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds or The Wisdom of Crowds ?
These are two of my favourite books :
In 2004,
James Surowiecki ( an American Journalist ) published a book called “ The Wisdom
of Crowds “ which talked about the aggregation of information in the group ,
resulting in decisions that often better than it could have been made by any
single member of the group.
The Wisdom of Crowds is generally traced back to an observation by
Charles Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton in 1907. Galton pointed out that the
average of all the entries in a ‘guess the weight of the ox’ competition at a
country fair was amazingly accurate – beating not only most of the individual
guesses but also those of alleged cattle experts. This is the essence of the
wisdom of crowds: their average judgement converges on the right solution.
On the contrary ,
this book “ Extraordinary Popular Delusion and Madness of Crowds “ by Charles
MacKay wrote about the crowd psychology that drives numerous “ National
Delusions, “ Peculiar Follies “ and “ Psychology Delusions”, mentioning among
others manias like “The Tulip Mania “, The South Sea Company Bubble. “
“In reading the history of nations, we find that,
like individuals, they have their whims and their peculiarities; their seasons
of excitement and recklessness, when they care not what they do. We find that whole community suddenly fix their minds upon one object, and go mad in its
pursuit; that millions of people become simultaneously impressed with one
delusion, and run after it, till their attention is caught by some new folly
more captivating than the first...Money, again, has often been a cause of the
delusion of multitudes. Sober nations have all at once become desperate
gamblers and risked almost their existence upon the turn of a piece of
paper... Men, it has been well said, thinks in herds; it will be seen that they
go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one”
The quotation is taken from its preface. If it sounds amazingly relevant
to our current economic situation, it's because it is. It may be the most relevant
book you will ever read.
Crowd psychology can create an
emotional feedback loop whereby we may just want to hear only what we want. For
MacKay, crowds were never wise, they were never even reasonable and collective
judgement was doom to be extreme.”
In recent years, researchers
have spent a significant amount of time and effort teasing apart the factors
that make crowds stupid. One important factor turns out to be the way members
of a crowd influence each other.
It turns out that if a crowd
offers a wide range of independent estimates, then it is more likely to be
wise. But if members of the crowd are influenced in the same way, for example
by each other or by some external factor, then they tend to converge on a biased
estimate. In this case, the crowd is likely to be stupid. These biases can
really skew the result and could be the way that destroys the wisdom of a crowd.
In another classic book written
by Gustave Le Bon in 1895:” The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind “, Le Bon
argued that “the crowd was more than just the sum of its members, instead, it was a
kind of independent organism, it had an identity and a will of its own, and it
often acts in ways that no one within the crowd intended. When the crowd did
act, it invariably acted foolishly. A crowd might be brave or cowardly or cruel,
but it could never be smart.”
The wisdom ( or stupidity ) of the crowd may also be determined by the result
which “the crowd “ desired and wanted to see.
Do you think that the voting of Donald
Trump as 45th President of the US as “Wisdom of Crowd “ or Dow 20,000 as
“Extraordinary
Popular Delusions and Madness of Crowds “?
Cheers !!
Quote Of The Day :
“Regardless
of what we believe about the motivations for individual behaviour, once we
become part of a group, we cannot be sure what to expect . “ by Philip Ball in
his book “ Critical Mass “
Good one.
ReplyDeleteI would neither categorize Trump's election as 'wisdom' nor 'crowds'. The majority of the US people, who bothered to vote, voted for Clinton. Actually less than 20% of Americans voted for him. But 100% of its people have to live with that outcome for at least four years.
Is that how a democracy should work?
And in regards to DOW 20,000, it is just an index number without much fundamental meaning. Valuations like P/E or PEG are meaningful for comparing current with the past.
Having said that merely being part of a group always makes us less inclined to ask the relevant questions. Yes, being part of the herd is fun while it lasts, but it's seldom lucrative for very long, and it's impossible to predict when the herd will change its 'mind.'
If I want to make more money than other people, I can't invest like other people, right?
Hi Andy,
DeleteYah! The College Electoral system seems doesn't work here ,,,at least for majority democratic where less became president ,,, as for Dow 20k ,,,yup,, valuation matter than the figure ,,,as you said,, sometime ,,one need to be " contrarian " in order to win the market,,, :-)
Cheers !!
Hi STE,
ReplyDeleteof the 3 books you mentioned, which book will be a must read? :)
thank you
Jovan
Hi jovan,
DeleteEach book have their own story and strength and serve different purpose ,,,but if you are interest in " financial market history " ,, and learn from the pass market mistake ...the " Extraordinary Popular Delusion and Madness.." will be better ..." The Crowd " might be too classic as there is new research in "psychology " field appeared with new evidence... I am having this for collection of some " classic book "..
Cheers ! :-)